🏥 Conversational Clinical Operating System: Beyond AI Scribes

What You'll Learn:

• 📊 What defines a conversational clinical operating system vs. traditional AI scribes
• 💡 Why proactive intelligence matters more than documentation
• ⚡ How workflow orchestration reduces physician burnout by 13% in 30 days
• 🎯 Real-world clinical use cases across specialties
• 📈 Implementation roadmap and success metrics

The problem isn't that physicians are typing too much. The problem is that they're thinking too much about things the system should handle automatically.

For years, we've been sold a narrative: AI scribes will save physicians time by handling documentation. And they do—by about 15-20 minutes per day. But physicians are still drowning in administrative burden. They're still experiencing burnout at 63% rates. They're still spending 4+ hours daily on EMR tasks that have nothing to do with patient care.

Why? Because documentation is only one piece of the clinical workflow puzzle.

The evolution from AI scribes to conversational clinical operating systems represents a fundamental shift in how healthcare technology should work. It's not about automating typing anymore. It's about orchestrating thinking—anticipating what comes next, executing the full workflow, and giving physicians back their cognitive bandwidth.

This guide defines this new category, explains why it matters, and shows you exactly how conversational clinical operating systems are changing the game in 2026.

---

📊 The Evolution: From AI Scribes to Clinical Operating Systems

AI scribes were supposed to be revolutionary. And in 2022-2023, they were—relatively speaking. They represented the first mainstream attempt to use conversational AI to reduce physician documentation burden.

But here's what happened:

AI scribes solved one problem (typing) and left everything else untouched. Physicians still had to manually enter orders. Still had to complete forms. Still had to manage task lists. Still had to navigate fragmented systems. The 15-20 minutes saved on documentation got absorbed by everything else.

The market matured quickly. By 2024-2025, AI scribes became increasingly commoditized. Every major EHR vendor launched their own. Startups proliferated. The differentiation evaporated. And the burnout reduction plateaued at 4-5%—barely noticeable in clinical practice.

The "why now" moment arrived in late 2025:

Healthcare organizations realized that incremental improvements to documentation weren't moving the needle on burnout. The American Medical Association's 2025 physician burnout survey showed that administrative burden—not clinical stress—was the #1 driver of burnout. And administrative burden extends far beyond typing. It's the cognitive load of managing fragmented workflows, remembering next steps, and manually executing tasks that should be automated.

Simultaneously, conversational AI matured. Large language models became better at understanding clinical context, anticipating next actions, and orchestrating multi-step workflows. The technology that could only handle documentation could now handle orchestration.

This convergence created the conversational clinical operating system category.

Dimension	AI Scribes	Conversational Clinical OS
Primary Function	Documentation	Workflow Orchestration
Scope	Reactive (documents what you say)	Proactive (anticipates next actions)
Burnout Reduction	4-5%	13% in 30 days
Time Saved Daily	15-20 minutes	2-3 hours
Integration Depth	Shallow (EHR input)	Deep (full clinical workflow)
Clinical Intelligence	Minimal	Comprehensive
Order Entry	Manual	Automated suggestions
Form Completion	Manual	Automated
Task Management	Manual	Proactive coordination
Market Status	Commoditized	Emerging category

The shift is profound. AI scribes are becoming infrastructure—table stakes that every vendor will have by 2026. The competitive battlefield has moved upstream, to the question of what happens after documentation. How do you turn that documented information into action? How do you anticipate what the physician needs next? How do you orchestrate the full clinical workflow?

That's what a conversational clinical operating system does.

---

💡 What Is a Conversational Clinical Operating System?

A conversational clinical operating system is an intelligent, multi-modal platform that listens to physician-patient conversations and orchestrates the complete clinical workflow—from documentation through clinical decision support, order entry, form completion, and task management.

Unlike AI scribes, which are primarily input mechanisms, a conversational clinical operating system is a full operating system. It sits at the center of clinical work and coordinates all the moving parts.

Key characteristics:

1. Conversational Interface as Primary Input The system listens to the natural conversation between physician and patient. It understands clinical context, captures relevant information, and maintains continuity across the encounter. This is table stakes—it's what AI scribes do. But for a conversational clinical operating system, it's just the beginning.

2. Proactive Intelligence Layer This is where the category differentiates. After listening to the conversation, the system doesn't just document—it analyzes. It asks: What should happen next? What orders are likely needed? What forms must be completed? What clinical decision support is relevant? What tasks need coordination?

The system generates these insights proactively, without waiting for the physician to request them. It anticipates the next 3-5 actions based on the clinical context, patient history, relevant guidelines, and institutional protocols.

3. Full Workflow Orchestration The system doesn't just suggest actions—it executes them. It can:

• Auto-populate order sets based on the clinical scenario
• Complete forms automatically with relevant data
• Generate task lists for care coordination
• Integrate clinical decision support (drug interactions, guideline recommendations, contraindications)
• Coordinate with other systems (lab ordering, imaging, referrals)
• Manage follow-up workflows

4. Clinical Context Awareness A conversational clinical operating system maintains deep understanding of clinical context. It knows the patient's history, current medications, allergies, recent labs, and relevant guidelines. It applies this context to every recommendation and action.

5. Bidirectional Integration Unlike AI scribes that primarily feed into the EHR, a conversational clinical operating system integrates bidirectionally. It pulls data from the EHR, clinical databases, and external systems. It pushes decisions, orders, and documentation back into the EHR and connected systems.

6. Continuous Learning and Adaptation The system learns from each interaction. It understands how individual physicians work, their preferences, their specialty-specific patterns, and their institutional context. Over time, it becomes more accurate and anticipatory.

---

⚡ Core Capabilities That Define the Category

🎯 Proactive Clinical Intelligence

This is the defining capability. A conversational clinical operating system doesn't wait for instructions—it anticipates needs.

In practice: A physician documents a patient with Type 2 diabetes, elevated HbA1c, and new hypertension. Before the physician finishes speaking, the system has already:

• Identified that metformin dose optimization is likely needed
• Recognized that a statin should be considered (per ACC/AHA guidelines)
• Noted that an ACE inhibitor or ARB is indicated for both diabetes and hypertension
• Flagged that annual diabetic labs (microalbumin, lipid panel) are overdue
• Generated a task for diabetes education referral
• Suggested follow-up in 4-6 weeks to reassess

The physician sees these suggestions in real-time and can approve, modify, or reject them with a single word or gesture. The approved actions execute automatically.

Impact: Reduces cognitive load. Physicians don't have to remember guidelines or protocols—the system remembers for them. They don't have to manually construct orders—the system suggests them. They approve or modify, but the system does the thinking.

📋 Intelligent Documentation

This is table stakes, but it's done differently than AI scribes. Documentation isn't just transcription—it's intelligent capture.

The system:

• Captures the clinical narrative with appropriate detail
• Structures documentation according to institutional standards (SOAP, HPI-ROS-PMH-PSH, etc.)
• Pulls relevant data from previous encounters and external records
• Flags important findings or changes
• Generates appropriate coding and billing information
• Integrates with quality measures and compliance requirements

Impact: Reduces documentation burden and improves accuracy. Physicians review and approve documentation in seconds rather than minutes.

🔄 Automated Order Entry and Form Completion

A conversational clinical operating system doesn't just suggest orders—it executes them.

In practice: Based on the clinical conversation and proactive analysis, the system:

• Generates complete order sets with appropriate parameters (dose, frequency, route, duration)
• Populates medication reconciliation
• Completes referral forms with clinical justification
• Generates lab requisitions with appropriate panels
• Coordinates imaging orders with scheduling
• Manages prior authorization workflows

The physician reviews the generated orders in a single interface and approves or modifies them. The system then executes them across all relevant systems.

Impact: Reduces manual order entry from 15-20 minutes to 2-3 minutes. Improves order accuracy. Eliminates transcription errors.

🧠 Clinical Decision Support Integration

A conversational clinical operating system integrates clinical decision support throughout the workflow.

In practice: The system:

• Checks for drug-drug interactions in real-time
• Flags contraindications and allergies
• Suggests evidence-based alternatives
• Provides guideline-based recommendations (ACC/AHA, ADA, USPSTF, etc.)
• Identifies quality measures and performance gaps
• Suggests preventive care opportunities

This isn't passive—it's integrated into the workflow. When a physician suggests a medication, the system immediately checks for interactions. When documenting a diagnosis, the system suggests relevant preventive care. When ordering a test, the system checks if it's appropriate per guidelines.

Impact: Improves clinical quality, reduces errors, and ensures guideline compliance.

📊 Task Coordination and Follow-up Management

A conversational clinical operating system manages the downstream workflow—the tasks, follow-ups, and care coordination that typically fall through the cracks.

In practice: The system:

• Generates task lists for nursing, care coordination, and support staff
• Schedules follow-up appointments based on clinical need
• Coordinates referrals and specialist communication
• Manages prior authorizations
• Tracks pending results and alerts appropriate staff
• Manages patient education and discharge planning

Impact: Reduces care coordination burden on physicians. Improves follow-up compliance. Ensures nothing falls through the cracks.

🔗 Bidirectional EHR Integration

Unlike AI scribes that primarily document into the EHR, a conversational clinical operating system integrates deeply with the EHR and all connected systems.

In practice: The system:

• Pulls real-time data from the EHR (medications, allergies, labs, imaging, notes)
• Integrates with external systems (lab results, imaging, pharmacy)
• Pushes documentation, orders, and decisions back to the EHR
• Maintains data synchronization across all systems
• Provides a unified interface that reduces physician navigation burden

Impact: Eliminates data silos. Reduces the need to navigate multiple systems. Ensures information is current and accurate.

---

🔄 How a Conversational Clinical Operating System Works

Understanding the workflow is key to appreciating why this category is fundamentally different from AI scribes.

The Workflow: From Conversation to Orchestrated Action

Phase 1: Conversational Capture (Real-time) The system listens to the physician-patient conversation. It captures:

• Chief complaint and history of present illness
• Review of systems
• Physical exam findings
• Assessment and plan
• Patient questions and concerns
• Non-verbal cues (tone, emphasis, hesitation)

This happens in real-time, with the system filtering background noise and focusing on clinical content.

Phase 2: Clinical Context Analysis (Milliseconds) The system analyzes the captured information against:

• Patient's medical history and current medications
• Relevant lab results and imaging
• Current vital signs and clinical measurements
• Institutional protocols and guidelines
• Specialty-specific best practices
• Individual physician patterns and preferences

Phase 3: Proactive Intelligence Generation (Real-time) Based on the clinical context, the system generates:

• Likely diagnoses and differential diagnoses
• Recommended orders (labs, imaging, medications)
• Relevant clinical decision support
• Quality measures and preventive care opportunities
• Care coordination needs
• Follow-up requirements

This is where the system anticipates what comes next. It's not waiting for the physician to ask—it's proactively suggesting the next 3-5 actions.

Phase 4: Documentation and Recommendations (Presented to Physician) The system presents:

• Complete clinical documentation (structured and narrative)
• Suggested orders and medications
• Clinical decision support alerts and recommendations
• Care coordination tasks
• Follow-up scheduling suggestions

All in a single, unified interface that the physician can review in 30-60 seconds.

Phase 5: Physician Review and Approval (30-60 seconds) The physician reviews the suggestions. They can:

• Approve all suggested actions with a single click
• Modify specific orders or recommendations
• Reject suggestions they disagree with
• Add additional orders or instructions
• Adjust documentation as needed

The interface is designed for rapid approval. Most physicians approve 80-90% of suggestions without modification.

Phase 6: Automated Execution (Seconds) Once approved, the system executes all actions:

• Documentation is submitted to the EHR
• Orders are placed in the order entry system
• Referrals are sent to specialists
• Tasks are assigned to care coordination staff
• Follow-up appointments are scheduled
• Patient instructions are generated

This happens automatically, without further physician involvement.

Phase 7: Workflow Orchestration (Ongoing) The system coordinates the downstream workflow:

• Tracks pending results and alerts appropriate staff
• Manages prior authorizations
• Coordinates specialist communication
• Ensures follow-up appointments happen
• Manages patient education and discharge planning

Proactive vs. Reactive: The Critical Difference

This comparison illuminates why the category exists:

Aspect	Reactive AI (Scribes)	Proactive AI (Clinical OS)
Trigger	Physician action	Clinical context
Timing	After physician decides	Before/during physician decision
Intelligence	Transcription	Analysis + anticipation
Scope	Documentation	Full workflow
Physician Effort	Dictate + review + execute orders	Review + approve + done
Cognitive Load	Moderate (physician still decides)	Low (system anticipates)
Time Per Encounter	8-10 minutes	2-3 minutes
Workflow Interruption	Minimal	None (integrated)
Learning	Limited	Continuous

The key insight: Reactive systems make the physician faster at what they were already doing. Proactive systems change what the physician has to do in the first place.

---

🏥 Use Cases: Conversational Clinical Operating Systems in Action

The power of this category becomes clear when you see it applied across different specialties and clinical scenarios.

Primary Care: Managing Multiple Comorbidities

Scenario: 68-year-old patient with Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, CAD, and new knee pain.

AI Scribe Approach:

• Physician dictates encounter
• Scribe documents the conversation
• Physician manually reviews documentation
• Physician manually enters orders for any needed labs or imaging
• Physician manually completes referral forms
• Physician manually schedules follow-up
• Total time: 12-15 minutes

Conversational Clinical OS Approach:

• System listens to encounter
• System analyzes patient's diabetes control (HbA1c 8.2%), BP control (145/92), CAD status (last stress test 2 years ago)
• System proactively suggests:
  • Metformin dose increase
  • Addition of GLP-1 agonist (per ADA guidelines)
  • Lisinopril dose increase
  • Aspirin continuation verification
  • Lipid panel and comprehensive metabolic panel
  • EKG and stress test consideration
  • Orthopedic referral for knee pain
  • Physical therapy referral
  • Follow-up in 4 weeks
• Physician reviews all suggestions in 45 seconds
• Physician approves with one click
• System executes all orders, referrals, and follow-up scheduling
• Total time: 3-4 minutes

Outcome: 3x faster. Better guideline adherence. Nothing falls through the cracks. Physician cognitive load dramatically reduced.

Emergency Medicine: High-Acuity Decision-Making

Scenario: 45-year-old with chest pain, shortness of breath, and elevated troponin.

AI Scribe Approach:

• Physician dictates findings
• Scribe documents
• Physician manually reviews and enters orders
• Physician manually coordinates cardiology consultation
• Physician manually manages task list
• Total time: 8-10 minutes (plus ongoing coordination)

Conversational Clinical OS Approach:

• System listens to presentation
• System immediately recognizes acute coronary syndrome pattern
• System proactively suggests:
  • 12-lead EKG (if not done)
  • Serial troponin protocol
  • Aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin dosing
  • Cardiology stat consultation
  • ICU admission orders
  • Continuous cardiac monitoring
  • NPO status
• Physician reviews in 30 seconds
• Physician approves
• System executes all orders and coordinates ICU/cardiology
• Total time: 2-3 minutes (plus ongoing coordination)

Outcome: Faster decision-making in high-acuity scenario. Ensures nothing is missed. Reduces physician cognitive load when it matters most.

Specialty Care: Orthopedic Surgery

Scenario: 62-year-old with rotator cuff tear, considering surgical repair.

AI Scribe Approach:

• Physician documents examination findings
• Physician manually reviews imaging
• Physician manually enters surgical planning notes
• Physician manually completes surgical consent forms
• Physician manually coordinates pre-op testing
• Physician manually schedules surgery
• Total time: 15-20 minutes

Conversational Clinical OS Approach:

• System listens to examination and discussion
• System reviews imaging and prior imaging
• System proactively suggests:
  • Complete surgical planning documentation
  • Pre-op lab orders (CBC, CMP, coagulation studies)
  • EKG if age >50
  • Anesthesia consultation order
  • Surgical consent form completion
  • Surgical site marking protocol
  • Post-op pain management plan
  • Physical therapy referral
  • Surgery scheduling with OR coordination
• Physician reviews and approves in 1 minute
• System executes all orders and coordinates scheduling
• Total time: 3-4 minutes

Outcome: Dramatically faster. Ensures pre-op requirements are met. Reduces administrative burden on surgical staff.

Cardiology: Complex Decision-Making

Scenario: 72-year-old with heart failure, new atrial fibrillation, and renal impairment.

AI Scribe Approach:

• Physician documents complex clinical picture
• Physician manually reviews recent imaging and labs
• Physician manually enters orders for new medications
• Physician manually coordinates multiple specialist consultations
• Physician manually manages complex medication interactions
• Total time: 20-25 minutes

Conversational Clinical OS Approach:

• System listens to encounter
• System analyzes patient's heart failure status (EF 35%), AF (new onset), renal function (Cr 1.8)
• System proactively suggests:
  • Beta-blocker optimization
  • ACE inhibitor/ARB dosing (adjusted for renal function)
  • Anticoagulation strategy (CHA2DS2-VASc score calculation, bleeding risk assessment)
  • Diuretic adjustment
  • Electrolyte monitoring plan
  • Echocardiography if not recent
  • Holter or event monitor
  • Electrophysiology consultation consideration
  • Drug interaction checks (integrated)
  • Renal function-adjusted dosing (integrated)
• Physician reviews in 1-2 minutes
• Physician approves
• System executes all orders and coordinates consultations
• Total time: 4-5 minutes

Outcome: Complex clinical decision-making simplified. Drug interactions and renal dosing handled automatically. Specialist coordination automated.

Pediatrics: Preventive Care Focus

Scenario: 6-year-old for well-child visit.

AI Scribe Approach:

• Physician documents encounter
• Physician manually reviews immunization status
• Physician manually enters vaccination orders
• Physician manually completes preventive care forms
• Physician manually schedules follow-up and screening
• Total time: 10-12 minutes

Conversational Clinical OS Approach:

• System listens to encounter
• System reviews child's age, prior immunizations, and screening history
• System proactively suggests:
  • Complete documentation of growth and development
  • Age-appropriate immunizations (per CDC/AAP schedule)
  • Age-appropriate screening (vision, hearing, dental referral)
  • Developmental screening tool administration
  • Safety counseling documentation
  • Anticipatory guidance topics
  • Next visit scheduling
• Physician reviews in 45 seconds
• Physician approves
• System executes immunization orders, generates parent handouts, schedules follow-up
• Total time: 2-3 minutes

Outcome: Ensures no preventive care is missed. Improves immunization rates. Reduces administrative burden on pediatric practices.

Psychiatry: Documentation and Coordination

Scenario: 35-year-old with depression, anxiety, and substance use disorder starting treatment.

AI Scribe Approach:

• Physician documents complex psychiatric history
• Physician manually enters psychiatric medication orders
• Physician manually coordinates substance abuse treatment referral
• Physician manually completes psychiatric intake forms
• Physician manually manages crisis planning
• Total time: 18-20 minutes

Conversational Clinical OS Approach:

• System listens to comprehensive psychiatric interview
• System proactively suggests:
  • Complete psychiatric documentation (MSE, risk assessment)
  • Medication recommendations (SSRI/SNRI dosing, monitoring)
  • Substance abuse treatment referral
  • Psychotherapy referral coordination
  • Crisis plan documentation
  • Safety assessment and documentation
  • Follow-up scheduling (typically 1-2 weeks)
  • Patient education materials
• Physician reviews in 1-2 minutes
• Physician approves
• System executes referrals, generates patient materials, coordinates follow-up
• Total time: 4-5 minutes

Outcome: Ensures comprehensive assessment. Coordinates complex care. Reduces documentation burden on psychiatrists.

---

🎯 Conversational Clinical Operating System vs. AI Scribes: The Capability Gap

This comparison shows exactly why a new category was necessary.

Capability	AI Scribes	Conversational Clinical OS
Conversational Input	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Real-time Transcription	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Structured Documentation	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Proactive Order Suggestions	❌ No	✅ Yes
Automated Order Entry	❌ No	✅ Yes
Clinical Decision Support	❌ No	✅ Yes
Form Auto-completion	❌ No	✅ Yes
Task Coordination	❌ No	✅ Yes
Guideline Integration	❌ No	✅ Yes
Prior Authorization Management	❌ No	✅ Yes
Follow-up Scheduling	❌ No	✅ Yes
Referral Coordination	❌ No	✅ Yes
Time Saved Per Encounter	15-20 min	2-3 hours
Burnout Reduction (30 days)	4-5%	13%
Physician Satisfaction	78%	92%
Administrative Burden Reduction	10-15%	40-50%

The gap is substantial. AI scribes optimize one step in the workflow. Conversational clinical operating systems orchestrate the entire workflow.

Why the Gap Exists

AI Scribes:

• Built to solve one problem: typing
• Designed as input mechanisms, not orchestration platforms
• Limited integration with downstream systems
• No proactive intelligence
• No clinical decision support
• No task coordination

Conversational Clinical Operating Systems:

• Built to solve the entire workflow problem
• Designed as central orchestration platforms
• Deep integration with EHR and all connected systems
• Proactive intelligence anticipating next actions
• Integrated clinical decision support
• Task coordination and follow-up management

When Each Makes Sense

AI Scribes Make Sense If:

• Your primary pain point is dictation and documentation time
• You have limited EHR integration requirements
• You're looking for a simple, low-cost solution
• You don't need proactive intelligence or workflow orchestration
• You're willing to accept 4-5% burnout reduction

Conversational Clinical Operating Systems Make Sense If:

• Your primary pain point is overall administrative burden
• You need deep EHR and system integration
• You want to reduce physician cognitive load across the entire workflow
• You're looking for proactive intelligence and workflow orchestration
• You're targeting 13%+ burnout reduction and 2+ hours daily saved
• You want to improve clinical quality and guideline compliance

The market trajectory is clear: AI scribes are becoming commoditized infrastructure that every vendor will have. The competitive advantage is moving to conversational clinical operating systems that orchestrate the full workflow.

---

🚀 Implementation: Getting Started with a Conversational Clinical Operating System

Implementing a conversational clinical operating system is different from implementing an AI scribe. Here's what the process looks like.

Phase 1: Assessment and Planning (2-4 weeks)

Workflow Analysis

• Map current clinical workflows across key specialties
• Identify bottlenecks and administrative burden points
• Assess current EHR and system integrations
• Determine specialty-specific requirements

Technology Assessment

• Evaluate EHR compatibility and integration requirements
• Assess IT infrastructure and security requirements
• Determine data governance needs
• Plan for regulatory compliance (HIPAA, HITRUST, etc.)

Stakeholder Engagement

• Identify physician champions and early adopters
• Engage IT and clinical leadership
• Establish governance and decision-making structure
• Define success metrics and KPIs

Key Questions to Answer:

• Which specialties will pilot first?
• What are your specific workflow pain points?
• What systems need integration?
• What are your burnout reduction and time savings targets?

Phase 2: Pilot Deployment (4-8 weeks)

Pilot Cohort Selection

• Start with 10-20 early adopter physicians
• Mix of different specialties if possible
• Mix of EHR experience levels
• Committed to feedback and iteration

System Configuration

• Configure specialty-specific workflows
• Set up EHR integration
• Configure clinical decision support rules
• Establish institutional protocols and guidelines
• Train system on institutional preferences

Physician Training

• Hands-on training with clinical workflows
• Overview of proactive intelligence features
• Workflow optimization training
• Troubleshooting and support

Data Collection

• Track time savings (documentation, orders, follow-up)
• Measure burnout reduction (using validated burnout scales)
• Monitor clinical quality metrics
• Collect physician satisfaction and feedback

Phase 3: Optimization and Expansion (8-12 weeks)

Performance Analysis

• Analyze pilot results and outcomes
• Identify optimization opportunities
• Gather physician feedback
• Refine workflows and configurations

Optimization

• Adjust proactive intelligence algorithms based on feedback
• Refine order suggestions and clinical decision support
• Optimize workflow orchestration
• Improve integration with specific EHR workflows

Expansion Planning

• Plan rollout to broader physician groups
• Identify additional specialties for implementation
• Develop training and support programs
• Plan for ongoing monitoring and optimization

Phase 4: Full Deployment (12+ weeks)

Phased Rollout

• Deploy to additional specialties and physician groups
• Maintain ongoing training and support
• Monitor performance metrics across all users
• Continuously optimize based on usage patterns

Ongoing Optimization

• Regular feedback loops with physicians
• Continuous improvement of proactive intelligence
• Expansion of clinical decision support
• Integration with additional systems as needed

Implementation Timeline

Success Metrics and KPIs

Metric	Baseline	30-Day Target	90-Day Target
Time Saved Per Encounter	0	60-90 min	120-180 min
Documentation Time	4-5 min	1-2 min	1-2 min
Order Entry Time	8-10 min	2-3 min	2-3 min
Administrative Tasks Time	45-60 min/day	30-40 min/day	20-30 min/day
Burnout Score	Baseline	-5 to -8 points	-10 to -15 points
Physician Satisfaction	Baseline	85%+	90%+
System Adoption Rate	0%	60%+	85%+
Order Accuracy	Baseline	+5-10%	+10-15%
Guideline Compliance	Baseline	+10-15%	+20-25%
Patient Satisfaction	Baseline	+2-5